April 23, 2009
TED Talks- Robinson, Gates, & Schwartz
I watched Sir Ken Robinson, Bill Gates, and Barry Schwartz give TED Talks on www.ted.com and I’d like to comment on what I thought were highlights of each talk.
Sir Ken Robinson
The first point of Robinson’s that really grabbed my attention was that creativity is as important as literacy. I can see this statement being true in this day in age. One thing Sara often tells us in ED483 is that students can find any information they want on the Web nowadays. I’m an advocate of teaching spelling and grammar and other aspects of literacy, but now computers can check those things (with about 70% accuracy, I’d say) for them. Maybe all of this new technology can help students focus less on technical aspects of learning and focus more on creativity. (It almost hurt me to say that, because I’m a grammar/literacy freak.)
Robinson mentioned an educational hierarchy shaped as follows:

According to the website The Michigan Merit Curriculum, Michigan is following this hierarchy. In order to graduate from college, students must complete 4 credits of both math and language arts, 3 credits of both social studies and science, 1 credit of health and physical education, and the arts aren’t even mentioned on this particular website. Being a music major, wanting to introduce students to the passion for music that I have but being afraid that the Michigan Merit Curriculum is taking jobs away from music educators, the above hierarchy looks like a big scary monster to me.
There are a few other ideas of Robinson’s that I’d just like to mention.
1. Academic Inflation- Once upon a time, you couldn’t get far with just a high school diploma and you needed to get a college education. Now, after several more periods of inflation, without a master’s degree, you’re looking at a fairly low-income job. Maybe that’s somebody’s way of trying to turn everyone into lifelong learners. (That was a half-sarcastic statement.)
I found a funny comic about this topic:

2. I wonder how many more possible future award-winning Broadway choreographers are sitting in our classrooms right now being fed Ritalin and told to sit still.
Bill Gates
I didn’t realize that Bill Gates was a college dropout. That kind of goes against Robinson’s idea of academic inflation. I guess people can be successful no matter what kind of education they have. It’s just a matter of what they make of the education they do have.
Dropout rates are astonishing! 30% of high school students never finish high school, and 50% of high school students who are minorities never finish high school. Another surprising statistic is that students from low-income families have a higher chance of getting in jail than of getting a college degree. I hope that can be changed somehow.
I’ve heard that Bill Gates’ charter schools are pretty top-notch, and I remember from earlier in the semester seeing a quote from Bill Gates that the American school system doesn’t need to be reformed; it needs to be rebuilt. I would love to see one of his schools, such as KIPP (Knowledge is Power), and see if his schools would be a good direction toward which the national school system should go.
What surprised me most about Gates’ talk was how teachers are currently assessed. There is a limit of times that a principal can enter a classroom and the principal must give warning?! It makes sense now when I look back at high school. Teachers would announce when the principal would be visiting and tell us to be good and then the teachers would even teach differently when the principal was watching. He’s right. Something needs to be done about that.
One other little funny comment. When he announced he was giving everyone in the audience a free copy of the book he was talking about, I had to reassess the situation and figure out if I was watching Oprah or a TED Talk.
Barry Schwartz
Schwartz didn’t hold my attention nearly as well as Robinson and Gates did. The highlight of Schwartz’s talk for me was when he was comparing the improvisation skills needed in teaching and other professions to the improvisation skills of jazz musicians. At first, I thought, “What a great comparison! Teachers are constantly having to improvise based on behavioral situations, students’ moods, their moods, behaviors of co-teachers, and the list goes on and on! And they still have a basic set of rules they have to follow, but as Schwartz said, they have to kind of dance around different acceptable behaviors and actions within those rules.” Schwartz’s comparison made a ton of sense to me.
As I thought about it more, though, I thought about my own experiences with jazz improvisation. I was classically trained on the piano and when I joined jazz band in high school, I panicked whenever I was asked to improvise. “Just play notes in the chord!” my band teacher would say. It didn’t make any sense to me. There weren’t notes– specific rules– on the page for me to follow. Over the years, I’ve become much more comfortable with improvisation, but I would still MUCH rather have those basic rules laid out in front of me and know exactly what to do. That could mean one of three things:
1. I disagree with Barry Schwartz’s ideas.
2. According to Barry Schwartz, I won’t do well in teaching situations that involve improvisation.
3. Scores (specific sets of rules) work better for some people, and lead sheets (basic sets of rules with room to dance around) work better for others.
I think– and hope– the third idea is true.
Filed by emstrazz at 5:37 pm under Uncategorized
No Comments
1 Comment